(Created) |
(Expand) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|read=Read by [[Robin Upton]] in episode [[576]]. | |read=Read by [[Robin Upton]] in episode [[576]]. | ||
|seealso= | |seealso= | ||
| − | |description=David Graeber takes an anthropologist's view of money and debt, looking at evidence outside the purview of economists such as vedic texts, and anthropologists accounts. | + | |description=David Graeber takes an anthropologist's view of money and debt, looking at evidence outside the purview of economists such as vedic texts, and anthropologists accounts. This book is a slaughterhouse of economists' sacred cows. He shows, for example, that not only has there never been any evidence that money evolved from barter, but that for over a century, there has abeen a lot of evidence that it didn't. Disregarding such conventional wisdoms, he describes a very different picture of the world's economic history, one in which money and debt are not an impartial, amoral facts of ecvonomic life, but go hand in hand with state sponsored imperial violence. Indeed, he suggests we think hard about the very idea of considering 'the economy' to be separate from other facets of life. |
| − | |contents=# | + | |contents=# On The Experience of Moral Confusion [[576]] |
| − | # | + | # The Myth of Barter [[577]] |
| − | # | + | # Primordial Debts |
| + | # Cruelty and Redemption | ||
| + | # A Brief Treatise on the Moral Grounds of Economic Relations | ||
| + | # Games with Sex and Death | ||
| + | # Honor and Degradation, or, On the Foundations of | ||
| + | # Contemporary Civilization | ||
| + | # Credit Versus Bullion, And the Cycles of History | ||
| + | # The Axial Age (800 BC-600 AD) | ||
| + | # The Middle Ages (600 AD-1450 AD) | ||
| + | # Age of the Great Capitalist Empires (1450-1971) | ||
| + | # (1971- The Beginning of Something Yet to Be Determined) | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:40, 9 November 2011
Debt, The First 5000 Years, by David Graeber (2011)
Read by Robin Upton in episode 576. List of Episodes
David Graeber takes an anthropologist's view of money and debt, looking at evidence outside the purview of economists such as vedic texts, and anthropologists accounts. This book is a slaughterhouse of economists' sacred cows. He shows, for example, that not only has there never been any evidence that money evolved from barter, but that for over a century, there has abeen a lot of evidence that it didn't. Disregarding such conventional wisdoms, he describes a very different picture of the world's economic history, one in which money and debt are not an impartial, amoral facts of ecvonomic life, but go hand in hand with state sponsored imperial violence. Indeed, he suggests we think hard about the very idea of considering 'the economy' to be separate from other facets of life.
# On The Experience of Moral Confusion 576
|