From UnwelcomeGuests
Revision as of 17:05, 8 August 2017 by Criegod (Talk | contribs) (Evidence -- ~~~~: new section)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Evidence -- Criegod (talk) 17:05, 8 August 2017 (PDT)

I admit that i haven't listened to the full episode with full attention. But i have "listened" to it, then went to Emory's For the Record program and listened to episode 902 (same "patchy" attention). I hadn't known about Gehlen's connection to Radio Free Europe but... i was looking for something that would tell me something i didn't know about Edward Snowden and "l'Affaire Snowden". Particularly since some very definite statements about this were made as a deep-state operation. However, i didn't hear *any evidence*. Snowden has always seemed authentic to me. Considering the whole affair from start to finish, nothing ever particularly struck me as not smelling right. But in line with understanding that the rabbit hole can always go deeper, i approach the subject with an open mind. Only... *no evidence* (that i heard).

So, this episode is pretty much a big zip for me. I had already read a fair amount about the Gehlen organization so that wasn't what drew my attention to this episode. Having listened to stuff that i already (mostly) knew (and that, therefore, didn't really work to hold my sustained attention) i profess myself disappointed with this episode. I came for something but got nothing that i came for.

Anyone have a different opinion? Did i miss something?